As generative AI systems become increasingly capable of producing text, images, music, and other creative outputs, a fundamental copyright question has moved to the forefront: can prompting itself constitute a creative act? The third primer in The Dialogue’s AI & Copyright series examines how copyright law’s originality requirement applies in an era where human creativity […]
(๐๐ & ๐๐ฐ๐ฑ๐บ๐ณ๐ช๐จ๐ฉ๐ต ๐๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ฆ๐ด) Human Authorship in Copyright Law examines one of the most consequential questions emerging in the age of generative AI: can copyright law continue to function without a human author at its centre? As AI systems increasingly generate text, images, music, and audiovisual content with minimal human intervention, longstanding assumptions around originality,
Primer 2 – Human Authorship in Copyright Law Read More ยป
Generative AI is rapidly reshaping the economics of creativity. From content production and editing to discoverability, localisation, and monetisation, AI tools are increasingly becoming embedded within the everyday workflows of creators, agencies, musicians, designers, filmmakers, and digital entrepreneurs across India. Against this backdrop, Augmenting Creativity: An Empirical Assessment of How Generative AI Is Transforming Indiaโs
A joint publication by ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฎ๐ and ๐๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ง ๐๐๐ฌ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ก ๐ ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง As Indiaโs AI ecosystem scales rapidly, the conversation is shifting beyond algorithms and models to the physical infrastructure that sustains them. From data centres and cloud systems to energy, water, and land use, AI growth is increasingly tied to resource-intensive systems that demand careful planning
Generative artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming how content is created, distributed, and consumed. From text and images to music, code, and video, AI systems are now capable of producing outputs that closely resemble human creativityโoften with minimal human intervention. As these capabilities scale, they are raising a foundational legal question:What exactly qualifies as an โAI
Akshat Agrawal is the Founder of AASA Chambers and a PhD Candidate at the University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law, where his doctoral research on copyright reform is supervised by Professor Lionel Bently. He holds an LLM from the University of California, Berkeley, where his thesis examining copyrightโs distortionary effects received Googleโs Global Award for
Artificial intelligence is reshaping creative production, dissemination, and consumption at an unprecedented pace. As AI systems increasingly rely on large volumes of data and generate outputs that intersect with protected works, existing copyright frameworks are facing new interpretive and policy challenges. Across jurisdictions, policymakers, courts, creators, and technology developers continue to engage with unresolved questions
Policy Brief – Policy Prescriptions for Balancing AI and Copyright Concerns Read More ยป
Regulating AI Across Borders provides a clear overview of the EU AI Act, its risk-based structure, governance model, and compliance requirements. The publication also examines how industry, civil society, and research communities have responded to the Act. It then outlines Indiaโs current regulatory posture and highlights areas of alignment, divergence, and uncertainty. This summary presents
The paper outlines Indiaโs increasing adoption of AI, the strategic relevance of the IndiaAI Mission, and the growing prominence of AI in administrative, industrial, and policy settings. It also reflects on the tension between innovation and governance that characterises Indiaโs current regulatory moment.The full paper elaborates on how these tensions may influence the next phase
Research Paper: Indiaโs AI Landscape: An Overview Read More ยป
Published by the KAS Rule of Law Programme Asia The report, Will AI Pass the Bar? Mapping the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary: Insights from Singapore, India, and Taiwan, was officially launched at TechLaw.Fest in Singapore. The unveiling was led by the Honourable Justice Aiden Xu, Judge of the Singapore High Court, on
